On 1 September 2014 19:25, Eliot Lear <lear(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 9/1/14, 7:58 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
We seem to be getting (or I seem to be noticing) a lot more drafts that
aren't associated with a specific working group, or are pre-WG adoption.
I'm finding myself at a loss for where to go on some of these to "discuss"
that isn't off-topic for whatever list I might be directed to.
How about
[all of that]...
Or actually using our working group process?
So we'll only discuss ideas that are written up as drafts, and we'll only
discuss them in a working group, and we'll only create a working group
around drafts that have traction, and we'll only consider a draft to have
traction if there's discussion, and we'll only discuss them in a working
group, and ...
Dave.