On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:54 AM, <ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I have also read the draft, and while I'm not entirely enthusiastic about
the
approach, it's quite clear this is going to happen regardless, and having a
standardized mechanism for it strikes me as a far superior situation than
having a bunch of nonstandard ways to do it deploy.
I also find the objections to adopting it I've seen so far to be lacking
foundation.
I therefore support adoption of this draft.
Having read the entire thread up to here, including the last three posts
that I didn't understand, I think the above nicely sums up my position as
well. Ship it.
-MSK