Hi -
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
Sent: Dec 12, 2014 10:14 AM
To: "t.p." <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com>
Cc: "adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk"
<adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>,
"draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org"
<draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions(_dot_)all(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
"ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF
Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard
Hi Tom,
On Dec 12, 2014, at 1:08 PM, t.p. <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com> wrote:
On the question of Floating-Point, there is now 754-2008, which is a
tighter spec and is used in RFC6340.
What is 754-2008?
IEEE specification for floating point, 2008 edition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_floating_point
Randy