ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC

2014-12-16 10:36:14
from [Jari Arkko] [Permanent Link] 


Yes.  The text I propose to include for this purpose is as follows:

   
   The MoU also provides an option for either party to terminate the
   arrangement with six months notice.  Obviously such action would only
   be undertaken after serious consideration.  
+  In that case a new IANA
+  functions operator would be selected, and a new agreement with that
+  operator would be established.


Looks good. Thanks.

Jari

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
Next by Date:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08.txt> (OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem (acee)
Previous by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
Next by Thread:  Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response to the Internet Coordination Group Request for Proposals on the IANA protocol parameters registries) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]