Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-06.txt> (Draft Response

John,

On 12/3/14, 6:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
> It sounds like we want the same thing here, but when I read the draft,
> I don't see it actually saying that if there's a new IANA operator, we
> need a new equally good contract. That seems to me to be worth making
> explicit.
I think that's a fine suggestion.  The discussions and conclusions of
the WG, so far as I can tell, were exclusively focused on the ICANN/NTIA
relationship, and your suggestion reinforces the conclusion by inference
(we CAN change should the need arise) and it gives people a view as to
how we would see to the continuity of the service.

Eliot

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature