Speaking as someone who will not be on the IESG if/when this happens.
- I don't understand a significant reason against 2 years (yes, it puts it in
synch with the chair appointment, but so what?)
- I think 3 years is a long ask as Murray points out
- I do not know whether the need for the third AD will last three years
- I worry that 1 year would be too short especially if NomCom are not able to
process in time for March
- I worry that the overhead of being nominated would make 1 year too small a
reward
So, what was wrong with 2 years?
Adrian
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Murray S.
Kucherawy
Sent: 07 January 2015 17:28
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: term for 3rd RTG AD
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> wrote:
My personal preference, btw, is to put someone in place for 3 years.
I prefer a one year term, given that it seems a higher bar for employer support
to ask for three years versus one for a potential first term.
-MSK