On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo(_at_)tzi(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Not basing further IETF work on CBOR would ensure the IETF loses impact
there, and would accomplish what?
To head off one of those threads where arguments are rehashed repeatedly, I
think I'm gonna let the arguments given by Phillip and Sam stand on their
own now that I've stated my concern.
I also noticed that the active draft for this effort has a normative
dependency on CDDL.
How best to write up the spec is indeed an interesting issue.
For now, CDDL is a good way to discuss the draft, much better than
lobbing around large quantities of ambiguous English prose.
You and I agree here. I favor whatever it takes to make CDDL a viable
normative reference, so long as it doesn't preclude other efforts.
-andy