Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose)

On 27 May 2015, at 19:52, Larry Masinter wrote:

How would you update BCP70 on use of XML? Section 3 covers many of thepoints.


Reduce it to one sentence:

"Do not use XML for new wire protocols, please."

--
Joe Hildebrand

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), (continued) Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Nico Williams Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Nico Williams Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Carsten Bormann Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Joe Hildebrand Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Nico Williams Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Larry Masinter Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Larry Masinter Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Joe Hildebrand <= Re: [Cose] WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Martin Thomson Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Andrew Newton Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Carsten Bormann Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Andrew Newton Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: WG Review: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (cose), Tony Finch