Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"


On 2 Jun 2015, at 5:59, Stephen Farrell wrote:

Changes like using https by default have much broader justifications.


They also have much broader objections.

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(_at_)arbor(_dot_)net>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", (continued) Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Xiaoyin Liu Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Hector Santos Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Hector Santos Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Niels Dettenbach Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Roland Dobbins Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Paul Wouters Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Roland Dobbins Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Stephen Farrell Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Mark Baugher (mbaugher) Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Stephen Farrell Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Roland Dobbins <= Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Nico Williams Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", Roland Dobbins Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Sam Hartman Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Patrik Fältström Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Niels Dettenbach Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Mark Andrews Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Sam Hartman Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Tim Bray Re: Where are the places that block encrypted traffic?, Warren Kumari Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF", John Levine