Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF

Server-to-server TLS would indeed be a useful thing to have been turned on.
We will find out what the situation is. Stay tuned.


According to my mail logs, all my mail from the IETF arrives via IPv6,
negotiates a TLS1.2 connection, and the messages are DKIM signed.

I think that's about the best we can hope for.  Well done.

R's,
John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Joe Abley RE: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, MH Michael Hammer (5304) Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Jari Arkko Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, John Levine <= Message not available Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Xiaoyin Liu Message not available Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Xiaoyin Liu Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Russ Housley Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Joe Abley Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Stephen Farrell Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Phillip Hallam-Baker Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Joe Abley Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Hector Santos Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Måns Nilsson Re: Proposed Proposed Statement on e-mail encryption at the IETF, Brian E Carpenter