Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements

Aaron Zauner <azet(_at_)azet(_dot_)org> wrote:
    > UTA chairs recommended sending a mail about this to the UTA and IETF
    > lists. We're currently analyzing our datasets -- so more/detailed data
    > will become available shortly.

    > Over the past couple of months we've been collecting SMTP, IMAP and POP
    > (implicit TLS, STARTTLS) security measurements (primarily relating to
    > TLS, X.509 Certs and offered protocol extensions). I've given a short
    > talk at IETF93 in SAAG on the topic, the slides can be found over here:
    > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-saag-2.pdf

    >  * RC4 support is at about 83-85% * unsurprisingly TLS 1.0 is most

RC4 is supported by 83% of end points that support crypto, or of 83% of
end points that answer TCP?

What percentage support some kind of crypto, even if we might call it pretend
crypto now.

I didn't see the total number of hosts scanned in the slides.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature