Re: Last Call: Recognising RFC1984 as a BCP

Updating what I wrote:

On 8/10/15 8:42 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Which brings me to a final point.  Somewhere in this process, someone
> (preferably either a shepherding AD or the person requesting the change)
> can surely articulate the reasoning for this change.  I'm actually not
> aware of any other informational document being upgraded to BCP, so I
> don't know what has been done in the past or what process was used, but
> I was surprised that this wasn't in a write-up somewhere when the LC
> announcement issued.
Sorry- I missed the write-up the first time.  The question I would still
like clearly answered is the one that Dave Crocker asked.  What is the
intended effect?

Thanks,

Eliot

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature