ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification

2015-10-12 10:23:56
On 10/09/2015 04:33 AM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:
RFC 2152 may be informational, but it is normatively referenced
from a standards-track document.
(which one?)

well, that makes a mockery of the whole informational/standards-track 
distinction.

If you believe that, a careful study of RFC 3967 and the page at
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry might
leave you mighty unhappy.

The only unusual (well, slightly unusual) thing about this downref is
that we haven't gotten it into the list yet.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>