IETF Discussion (date)
October 31, 2015
- IETF 94 - Agenda Changes, IETF Agenda, 22:41
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Viktor Dukhovni, 14:08
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail}, Hector Santos, 12:40
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Viktor Dukhovni, 11:58
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Viktor Dukhovni, 10:09
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, John C Klensin, 09:21
- Re: [Uta] E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Aaron Zauner, 00:28
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Viktor Dukhovni, 00:06
October 30, 2015
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Doug Royer, 19:08
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Doug Royer, 18:58
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 18:36
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 18:27
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Dave Crocker, 18:07
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Joe Touch, 17:41
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John C Klensin, 17:24
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 15:43
- Visiting the W3C meeting, IETF Chair, 10:57
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., ned+ietf, 10:10
- Re: E-Mail Protocol Security Measurements, Aaron Zauner, 06:01
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-04, Roni Even, 04:42
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John Levine, 02:09
- Re: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, John Levine, 02:02
- RE: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, Ted Lemon, 00:51
October 29, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, Linus Nordberg, 19:50
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 16:13
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 14:21
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail {dkim-fail}, ned+ietf, 14:10
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ted Lemon, 11:06
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 10:36
- RE: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, John C Klensin, 08:47
- RE: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, Ted Lemon, 06:08
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Niels Dettenbach, 04:43
October 28, 2015
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, John C Klensin, 23:56
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Scott Bradner, 23:47
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Scott Bradner, 23:45
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 23:45
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Scott Bradner, 23:43
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 23:36
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Scott Bradner, 23:21
- Re: Email bar bof in Yokohama?, John C Klensin, 23:14
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Scott Bradner, 23:11
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 21:53
- Email bar bof in Yokohama?, Ted Lemon, 20:33
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Martin Rex, 19:48
- Re: I-D Action: draft-crocker-rfc2418bis-wgguidelines-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 17:50
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Viktor Dukhovni, 17:18
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:31
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 16:22
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., ned+ietf, 16:15
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 16:15
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 15:57
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John C Klensin, 15:36
- Extending the Call For Nominations - ART AD, NomCom Chair 2015, 15:34
- RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg), 15:33
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Viktor Dukhovni, 14:28
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 13:41
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Viktor Dukhovni, 13:35
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 13:14
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., t.p., 13:06
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John R Levine, 13:03
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Viktor Dukhovni, 12:11
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Dave Crocker, 10:35
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control the agenda (was: Re: Google threatens to break Gmail), Ted Lemon, 10:28
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Dave Crocker, 10:22
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 10:20
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Ted Lemon, 08:33
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat.com), 02:49
October 27, 2015
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John Levine, 19:03
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John R Levine, 18:59
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Mark Andrews, 18:28
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Martin Rex, 17:34
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., John R Levine, 17:06
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-02, Robert Sparks, 14:14
- RE: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Christian Huitema, 13:17
- Re: Incremental hacks and letting abusers control the agenda (was: Re: Google threatens to break Gmail), John C Klensin, 12:48
- Incremental hacks and letting abusers control the agenda (was: Re: Google threatens to break Gmail), Dave Crocker, 09:56
October 26, 2015
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., l.wood, 23:50
- Re: We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Brian E Carpenter, 23:44
- RE: ALERT: Hotel & Early Bird Registration Fee Deadline Friday, Pat (Patricia) Thaler, 18:25
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ted Lemon, 15:01
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Viktor Dukhovni, 14:04
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail, John C Klensin, 13:45
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Mark Rousell, 12:24
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John R Levine, 12:11
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ted Lemon, 12:09
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John C Klensin, 12:08
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:07
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John R Levine, 11:31
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John C Klensin, 11:27
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Jelte Jansen, 10:55
- Re: Extending the Call For Nominations - ART AD, Tim Wicinski, 10:47
- We need an architecture, not finger pointing., Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:26
October 25, 2015
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Brian E Carpenter, 17:09
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Philip Homburg, 15:42
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John Levine, 15:25
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Philip Homburg, 14:45
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, ned+ietf, 13:20
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John C Klensin, 12:49
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:30
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Paul Wouters, 06:34
October 24, 2015
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ted Lemon, 22:34
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Harald Alvestrand, 22:04
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Randy Bush, 22:02
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Harald Alvestrand, 21:41
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ted Lemon, 20:58
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail], Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 20:44
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Randy Bush, 18:40
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John Levine, 16:55
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Brian E Carpenter, 14:50
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Rich Kulawiec, 08:37
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Rich Kulawiec, 08:34
October 23, 2015
- Re: [Tools-discuss] IMAP access to the list archives, Robert Sparks, 14:55
- Re: mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail], John Levine, 14:47
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 14:21
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Martin Rex, 13:36
- Re: [Tools-discuss] IMAP access to the list archives, Elwyn Davies, 09:04
- IETF-94 Plenaries, IETF Chair, 04:41
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Dave Crocker, 03:34
- Re: DMARC stuff, Dave Crocker, 02:51
October 22, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, l.wood, 20:15
- Re: DMARC stuff, John R Levine, 19:27
- RE: Google threatens to break Gmail, Christian Huitema, 19:08
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Mark Andrews, 17:14
- Re: DMARC stuff, Rich Kulawiec, 14:41
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Brian E Carpenter, 14:41
- Re: DMARC stuff, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:33
- Re: DMARC stuff, David Morris, 14:30
- Re: DMARC stuff, Dave Crocker, 14:23
- Re: DMARC stuff, Dave Crocker, 14:19
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Rich Kulawiec, 12:36
- Re: DMARC stuff, John R Levine, 12:34
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Rich Kulawiec, 12:20
- Re: DMARC stuff, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:42
- mailman [was: Google threatens to break Gmail], Miles Fidelman, 11:24
- Re: DMARC stuff, Michael Richardson, 11:12
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, John Levine, 10:45
- DMARC stuff, John Levine, 10:43
- ALERT: Hotel & Early Bird Registration Fee Deadline Friday, IETF Secretariat, 10:36
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:02
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, Jari Arkko, 09:53
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Robert Sparks, 09:51
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, Robert Sparks, 09:48
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Paul Wouters, 09:39
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Dave Crocker, 09:13
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Andrew G. Malis, 09:10
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Russ Housley, 08:59
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:35
- Re: Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-02, Jari Arkko, 08:26
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Rich Kulawiec, 08:25
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04, Jari Arkko, 08:14
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, John C Klensin, 07:44
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Alexandre Petrescu, 07:27
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Alexandre Petrescu, 07:22
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Alexandre Petrescu, 07:21
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, John Dickinson, 06:18
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, Jari Arkko, 05:16
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Andrew G. Malis, 05:05
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03, Jari Arkko, 04:35
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, t.p., 03:14
- draft-zhou-tls-server-redirect-00.txt, Randy Bush, 01:03
October 21, 2015
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, l.wood, 23:40
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Brian E Carpenter, 21:21
- Re: Google threatens to break Gmail, Ross Finlayson, 21:00
- Google threatens to break Gmail, Brian E Carpenter, 19:05
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Robert Sparks, 15:42
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, 13:58
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Tim Wicinski, 13:04
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Ralph Droms, 11:28
- Re: Help test IMAP access to the IETF archives, Robert Sparks, 09:55
- IMAP access to the list archives, Robert Sparks, 09:49
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Randy Bush, 03:52
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Harald Alvestrand, 03:12
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Carsten Bormann, 01:28
October 20, 2015
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Fred Baker (fred), 23:56
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Loa Andersson, 21:55
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, l.wood, 19:30
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Mark Andrews, 19:29
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, joel jaeggli, 18:51
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Mark Andrews, 18:15
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, joel jaeggli, 18:04
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Mark Andrews, 17:39
- Re: municipal broadband, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 16:10
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Randy Presuhn, 14:53
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Carsten Bormann, 14:35
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Behcet Sarikaya, 14:34
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:24
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:12
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Bob Hinden, 11:10
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Behcet Sarikaya, 11:05
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, John C Klensin, 11:01
- Re: [OSPF] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07, Jari Arkko, 10:47
- municipal broadband, Bob Bivona, 10:46
- Re: 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Bob Hinden, 10:30
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Bob Hinden, 10:29
- 'retired' in Organization in xml for Internet Draft?, Alexandre Petrescu, 09:44
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf-14, Roni Even, 09:16
- Call for Review: <draft-sparks-genarea-interim-management-00.txt> (Interim Meeting Management), IETF Chair, 07:06
- Call for Review: <draft-sparks-genarea-manualpost-tracking-00.txt> (Tracking Manual I-D Post Requests), IETF Chair, 07:05
- Re: email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, Randy Bush, 01:55
- email reminders say when a draft expires, but not that you can't submit?, l.wood, 00:59
October 17, 2015
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04, Luigi Iannone, 14:51
- RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A, 11:12
- Re: NomCom 2015 - Request for feedback, Ray Pelletier, 08:56
- Re: NomCom 2015 - Request for feedback, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:49
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, Andrew G. Malis, 03:53
October 16, 2015
- Re: IETF 94 - Hackathon Information, Charles Eckel (eckelcu), 18:02
- Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02, Robert Sparks, 16:31
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03, Andrew G. Malis, 10:18
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03, Peter Yee, 09:50
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, t.p., 04:55
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03, Andrew G. Malis, 03:55
October 14, 2015
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-lisp-impact-04, Russ Housley, 11:51
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Martin Rex, 09:48
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, A. Rothman, 04:27
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Mark Andrews, 03:31
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, A. Rothman, 02:46
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Harald Alvestrand, 01:45
October 12, 2015
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Doug Royer, 15:35
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Hector Santos, 13:00
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Hector Santos, 12:48
- Re: [94all] IETF 94 - Final Agenda, Pushpasis Sarkar, 11:28
- RE: [94all] IETF 94 - Final Agenda, Weixinpeng (Jackie), 11:27
- RE: [94all] IETF 94 - Final Agenda, Sudhin Jacob, 11:26
- RE: [94all] IETF 94 - Final Agenda, Weixinpeng (Jackie), 11:26
- Re: [94all] IETF 94 - Final Agenda, Harish Chowdhary, 11:25
- Deadline in 3 weeks! Call for Nominations: 2016 Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP), Eggert, Lars, 11:24
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Dave Crocker, 10:44
- Re: The New RFC Editor Website, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor), 10:38
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Harald Alvestrand, 10:23
October 09, 2015
- IETF 94 - Final Agenda, IETF Agenda, 20:35
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Captive-Portal Identification in DHCP / RA' to Proposed Standard (draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-16.txt), Alexandre Petrescu, 13:09
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Captive-Portal Identification in DHCP / RA' to Proposed Standard (draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-16.txt), Jaap Akkerhuis, 13:06
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Captive-Portal Identification in DHCP / RA' to Proposed Standard (draft-wkumari-dhc-capport-16.txt), Alexandre Petrescu, 12:54
- Re: design team on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations, Rogerio Mariano, 10:07
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: 5gangip -- Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation (fixed and) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols., Loa Andersson, 01:07
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, John C Klensin, 00:19
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Viktor Dukhovni, 00:08
October 08, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Robert Sparks, 22:10
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, l.wood, 21:33
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: 5gangip -- Discussion of implications of the upcoming 5th Generation (fixed and) Mobile communication systems on IP protocols., Hosnieh Rafiee, 15:13
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, A. Rothman, 13:40
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Viktor Dukhovni, 11:06
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, John C Klensin, 08:29
- design team on (non-technical) changes affecting IETF operations, Jari Arkko, 07:11
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, A. Rothman, 06:22
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Mark Andrews, 02:23
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, Viktor Dukhovni, 01:53
- Re: RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, l.wood, 01:02
October 07, 2015
- Codesprint at IETF94, Robert Sparks, 14:56
- Re: YANG Tutorial and YANG Advice/Editing Session at IETF 95, Dave Crocker, 13:52
- The New RFC Editor Website, IETF Chair, 11:16
- RFC 2152 - UTF-7 clarification, A. Rothman, 03:22
- Re: YANG Tutorial and YANG Advice/Editing Session at IETF 95, Benoit Claise, 03:10
October 06, 2015
- AUTO: Ahmed Bakhat Masood is out of the office. (returning 10/09/2015), Ahmed Bakhat Masood, 18:14
- Gen-ART LC review: draft-ietf-aqm-fq-implementation-02, Pete Resnick, 17:07
- Re: YANG Tutorial and YANG Advice/Editing Session at IETF 95, Dave Crocker, 09:18
- Re: YANG Tutorial and YANG Advice/Editing Session at IETF 94, Benoit Claise, 09:02
- YANG Tutorial and YANG Advice/Editing Session at IETF 95, Benoit Claise, 08:07
October 01, 2015
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-03, Robert Sparks, 09:31
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-03, Alia Atlas, 09:29
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-03, Robert Sparks, 09:18
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-03, Alia Atlas, 08:49
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path-03, Jari Arkko, 08:03