On November 2, 2015 4:18:15 PM "Adrian Farrel"
<adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
Oh OK.
So there is a test for quality in advance, and if you fail the test you go
right
ahead and present anyway?
Yes, at least that is my understanding of what happened in this case.
Is that possibly broken?
Not broken strictly speaking, but it is a limitation or new requirement
depending on how you look at it.
Lou
I asked the meetecho folks about the presentation that we both saw fail and
they said they saw the same issues during a test with the presentor.
Perhaps we also need a high loss tollerant codec available for such cases.
Of course the added latency is likely to make interaction cumbersome, but
better than the complete failure we both witnessed -- where apparently the
presentor was told it wasn't join to work, but only had the option of
hoping his access link would (magically) improve. ..