John is correct.
I�ll confirm the addition of these with the IESG.
If any community consultation is needed, they will let us know.
Thank you John and John.
I am remined that RFC 4387 also defines "pgprevocations", same deal.
On 11/14/15, 3:48 PM, "ietf on behalf of John C Klensin"
<ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org on behalf of john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
wrote:
--On Saturday, November 14, 2015 16:31 -0500 John R Levine
<johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
I presume this was an oversight, since it would be unfortunate
if someone registered different services called certificiates,
crls, or pgpkeys. How does one do a retroactive IANA update?
When an omission is this obvious, there is precedent for a
relevant AD just asking IANA to update the table and IANA doing
it. Otherwise, we can make a community decision to waste a lot
of everyone's time :-(
john
-=-=-=-=-=-
[Attachment type=application/pkcs7-signature, name=smime.p7s]
-=-=-=-=-=-