Since that particular registry is first come first served for a
service only registration, it should not be an issue. John could
simply make a request on the IANA portal. Its the Well Known Services
registry, same as for port allocation.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Michelle Cotton
<michelle(_dot_)cotton(_at_)icann(_dot_)org> wrote:
John is correct.
I¹ll confirm the addition of these with the IESG.
If any community consultation is needed, they will let us know.
Thank you John and John.
Michelle
*******
Michelle Cotton
Protocol Parameters Engagement Manager
ICANN
On 11/14/15, 3:48 PM, "ietf on behalf of John C Klensin"
<ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org on behalf of john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com>
wrote:
--On Saturday, November 14, 2015 16:31 -0500 John R Levine
<johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
I presume this was an oversight, since it would be unfortunate
if someone registered different services called certificiates,
crls, or pgpkeys. How does one do a retroactive IANA update?
When an omission is this obvious, there is precedent for a
relevant AD just asking IANA to update the table and IANA doing
it. Otherwise, we can make a community decision to waste a lot
of everyone's time :-(
john