Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs

>> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125
>> normative language, in the specific email use case.
>
> Profiling it for email, yes.  Why should that make it *update* the
> document that specifies the general process?  Profiles need to
> normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.

OK, I can live with that.  Thanks for the clarification,

=JeffH