Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs

> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125 normative
> language, in the specific email use case.
Profiling it for email, yes.  Why should that make it *update* the
document that specifies the general process?  Profiles need to
normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.

Barry