On 3/17/2016 4:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one point.
Are we sure that it's totally gone away?
There were a number of ST2 (RFC1190) and ST2+ (RFC1819) deployments at
one point (in Japan, US and Germany). I don't believe any are still in
operation and historic sounds just fine to me.
Lou
(Co-chair of ST2+ WG, co-editor of RFC1819 -- also worked on and
deployed some ST implementations)
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
- 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
<status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally,
comments may be
sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.