RE: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> (Mov

Hi Brian, 

RFC1475 is already obsoleted. The status change asks also to deallocate IP 
version 7.   

I support this status change. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] De la part de Brian E 
> Carpenter
> Envoyé : vendredi 18 mars 2016 03:55
> À : ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> Objet : Re: Last Call: <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-
> 01.txt> (Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic) to Historic
>
> After some private email from Scott:
>
> The registry also assigns 7 to TP/IX, which became CATNIP.
>
> So 7 also needs to be changed to Reserved and RFC1707 and RFC1475
> both need to become Historic.
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-
> numbers.xhtml#version-numbers-1
>
>    Brian
>
> On 18/03/2016 09:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > If we are doing this, then I think that CATNIP (RFC1707) needs to be
> made
> > Historic at the same time, even though it didn't need an IP version
> number.
> > I also recall rumours that some people were actually using ST2 at one
> point.
> > Are we sure that it's totally gone away?
> >
> > Regards
> >    Brian Carpenter
> >
> > On 18/03/2016 08:15, The IESG wrote:
> > > The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
> > > Group IETF (iesg) to consider the following document:
> > > - 'Moving IP versions 5, 8, and 9 to Historic'
> > >   <status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-historic-01.txt> as Historic
> > >
> > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> > > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> > > ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2016-04-14. Exceptionally, 
> > > comments may
> be
> > > sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain the
> > > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> > >
> > > The file can be obtained via
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-
> historic/
> > > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ip-versions-5-8-9-to-
> historic/ballot/
> > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.