Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Christer Holmberg <
christer(_dot_)holmberg(_at_)ericsson(_dot_)com> wrote:

Maybe we should hold our meetings in Minecraft :)


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3612641/Company-open-OFFICE-inside-virtual-world-Minecraft.html


Only if we can replace hums with swordfights and I get the diamond sword.

Oh dear, the AD just got blown up by a creeper.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, (continued) Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, lloyd.wood Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Brian E Carpenter Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, lloyd.wood Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, John Levine Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Rich Kulawiec RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Christer Holmberg Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Michael StJohns Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100), Melinda Shore RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100), Christer Holmberg Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100), Stephen Strowes Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100), Phillip Hallam-Baker <= Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100, Marc Blanchet

Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100)