Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BG

On 6/26/16 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> There has been no discussion on the GROW mailing list about having this
> document published as Standards Track rather than informational and it's
> coming as a surprise to see that this was only announced at IESG Last
> Call a couple of days ago.  At the least, there ought to be some
> discussion about this before pushing it up into the publication queue.
The looking back at the document that was WGLCed (which is the current
version) the state was standards track. the individual sumbission draft
draft-ymbk-grow-blackholing-00 was flagged as such since initial
submission.  It's status therefore I think is well understood. Whether
that's appropriate or not is another question.

Afaik well know assignments (and there are precious few really) have
been generally regarded as standards action thought the ranges is split
like so.


Range   Registration Procedures
0xFFFF0000-0xFFFF8000   First Come First Served
0xFFFF8001-0xFFFFFFFF   Standards Action

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature