On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:47 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On 6/26/16 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
There has been no discussion on the GROW mailing list about having this
document published as Standards Track rather than informational and it's
coming as a surprise to see that this was only announced at IESG Last
Call a couple of days ago. At the least, there ought to be some
discussion about this before pushing it up into the publication queue.
The looking back at the document that was WGLCed (which is the current
version) the state was standards track. the individual sumbission draft
draft-ymbk-grow-blackholing-00 was flagged as such since initial
submission. It's status therefore I think is well understood. Whether
that's appropriate or not is another question.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/
has it marked as PS... which I too thought was correct.
-chris