Re: [GROW] Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-00.txt> (BLACKHOLE BG

On 6/27/16 6:50 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:47 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com
> <mailto:joelja(_at_)bogus(_dot_)com>> wrote:
>
>     On 6/26/16 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>     > There has been no discussion on the GROW mailing list about having this
>     > document published as Standards Track rather than informational and it's
>     > coming as a surprise to see that this was only announced at IESG Last
>     > Call a couple of days ago.  At the least, there ought to be some
>     > discussion about this before pushing it up into the publication queue.
>
>     The looking back at the document that was WGLCed (which is the current
>     version) the state was standards track. the individual sumbission draft
>     draft-ymbk-grow-blackholing-00 was flagged as such since initial
>     submission.  It's status therefore I think is well understood. Whether
>     that's appropriate or not is another question.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-blackholing/
>
> ​has it marked as PS... which I too thought was correct.​
ps is the first step in standards track.

> ​-chris​

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature