Job Snijders wrote:
To address the latest concerns, draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-02 has been
posted.
Executive summary:
- Changed intended status from STD to INFO
- Added section 4 "Vendor Implementation Recommendations"
- Simplify the security section
- Clarify in introduction that this is about destination based
blackholing
Job,
Sorry, but this update does not address the concerns raised about
clarifying the behavioural semantics of this flag. It's also not clear
why the security warning relating to denial of service attacks was removed.
Nick