On 11 Jul 2016, at 20:34, John C Klensin <john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
--On Monday, July 11, 2016 20:22 +0100 Tim Chown
<tjc(_at_)ecs(_dot_)soton(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:
On 11 Jul 2016, at 19:07, Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>
wrote:
I have some personal opinions about these things, but
ultimately, what does the community want to do?
Can we make sure this question is asked explicitly in the
post-meeting survey? That would allow feedback to be collated
in an efficient way.
Remember that post-meeting surveys historically do not reach
anyone who does not attend in person. To the extent to which
this is ultimately a strategic decision that affects the
community (and, to some extent, who can participate effectively
in the IETF), everyone needs to be asked (and, as Dave Crocker
points out, asking in a plenary doesn't do the job either0.
Sure, but asking on the survey gets a valuable indication of the impact of
those who did attend, and who experienced the experiment.
Tim