Hi Latif,
On 12/11/2016 20:17, Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] wrote:
Jon Postel will swizel in his grave if v10 is not assigned by IANA first.
Let's not confuse the market. A working group at ETSI has been formed 6
months ago called NGP ( Next Gereation Protocols) lashing at v4 and v6 to
invent a new one.
How incredibly foolish of them.
Brian
Also the ITU will jump on this one to occupy the v10
space :-)
Latif
-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Brian E
Carpenter
Sent: 12 November 2016 02:43
To: Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com>
Cc: Khaled Omar <eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com>;
ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: IPv10.
On 12/11/2016 14:15, Randy Bush wrote:
Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a
problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.
how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this has
created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?
Yes, I suggest mentioning that to Vint, Bob and a few others in 1977, so
that they can design IPv4 with extensible addresses. People in
2016 will be grateful.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------