Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt).

Dear Khaled,

if you are a new implementation of the Turing Test, then pass my deepest 
compliments to your author. Otherwise, PLEASE STOP sending this to the 
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing list.

Thanks, Lada

> On 22 Dec 2016, at 11:29, Khaled Omar 
> <eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>  
> Easy next step, some RFCs should be obsoleted and some others should be 
> updated.
>  
> For example, these RFCs should be obsoleted:
>  
> RFC 1853.
> RFC 2766.
> RFC 6146.
> RFC 6144.
>        .
>        .
>  
> These RFCs should be updated:
>  
> RFC 2460.
>       .
>       .
>       .
>  
> Looking for a private discussion regarding IPv10 future topics.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Khaled Omar
>  
>  
> From: Khaled Omar 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 10:24 PM
> To: 'ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
> Subject: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt).
>  
> Hi IETF members,
>  
> I would like to inform you that the IPv10 Internet draft has been 
> successfully uploaded.
>  
> Here is the link for the IPv10 Internet draft 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt
>  
> All  participants for the IPv10 discussion regardless if there will be 
> addition or modification will be highly appreciated.
>  
> Thanks for your time.
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Khaled Omar 
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67