Le 22/02/2017 à 18:46, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com
<mailto:markzzzsmith(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>> wrote:
Let's leave behind unnecessary practices that have been used to
extend IPv4's life, and that make things unnecessarily complicated
and more costly to operate and troubleshoot.
What he said.
I think this comparison to IPv4 is non-sense.
I think IPv6 should benefit from IPv4 experience of no-fixed-length
Interface ID and DHCP.
I think you should try the experience of trying to persuade ISPs to
involve DHCPv6 PD before you can claim networks can grow in the presence
of this /64 limit. Or otherwise tell when the smartphones 'tether' by
using a Standards Track protocol.
Until then there is no reason to have a /64 recommendation.
Alex