ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

2017-02-23 20:54:48

On Feb 21, 2017, at 2:21 PM, Karsten Thomann 
<karsten_thomann(_at_)linfre(_dot_)de> wrote:

Satisfies my desired outcome of the text, but I would like to modify it:
   IPv6 unicast routing is based on prefixes of any valid length up to
   128 [BCP198]. When using [SLAAC], [ILNP], or [NPT66] the Interface ID
   of unicast addresses is required to be 64 bits long. An exception is for
   example [RFC6164] which standardises 127 bit prefixes on point-to-point
   links. The RECOMMENDED prefix length is 64 bit, but prefix lengths up to
  128 bit can be possible on explicit configuration.


I’m reminded of when a vendor decided that /31 on ethernet was not a suitable 
configuration and did not properly disclose in the release notes, causing a 
subsequent series of outages.

I’m therefore cautious about the usage of any normative comment on bit mask 
length.

Nothing quite like your interfaces losing their IP config after upgrade because 
someone decided to more strictly interpret guidance.

- Jared

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>