From: "Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo(_at_)google(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 6:05 AM
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Randy Bush <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com> wrote:
the IETF and 6man absolutely have the ability to change the
standard,
but it should follow the proper process: write a draft, get
consensus,
that is the process we are currently in. but there seems to be
serious
disagreement over the draft.
AIUI the goal of the process is to reclassify the current
specification.
That severely restricts the types of changes that are possible. That
is the
basis on which this document gained WG consensus and reached IETF last
call.
Well yes and no. Reclassification means that the document has to be
made clear and error-free, erratum-less and I see that as valuable
regardless of the subsequent classification - look at the change log and
you will see the amount of value added.
By now, I sense that the consensus to make this a standard is wanting,
that we need to make a technical change that is inconsistent with
reclassification so we should make that change along with all the other
good things that are there already and recycle it at its current level.
Tom Petch
If we want to say that we're no longer reclassifying the current
specification but are instead opening the door to bigger changes, then
the
document should go back to the WG for further work because the
existing WG
consensus was based on the stated goal of reclassifying the document.