--
Alexandre Petrescu
alexandre(_dot_)petrescu(_at_)cea(_dot_)fr, tél 0169089223
Le 24/02/2017 à 19:36, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
Le 24/02/2017 à 19:21, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre(_dot_)petrescu(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com <mailto:alexandre(_dot_)petrescu(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>>
wrote:
Le 24/02/2017 à 18:53, Christopher Morrow a écrit :
yes, I think so.. for linux:
$ sudo ip -6 addr add 2001:700:4::1 dev em1
gets me:
inet6 2001:700:4::1/128 scope global
That address is good, but how about the routing table? Does it get
an entry like 2001:700:4::/64?
$ ifconfig em1
<snip>
inet6 addr: 2001:700:4::1/128 Scope:Global
<snip>
and:
$ netstat -rnA inet6
Kernel IPv6 routing table
Destination Next Hop Flag Met Ref
Use If
2001:700:4::1/128 :: U 256 0
0 em1
<snip>
2001:700:4::1/128 :: Un 0 1
0 lo
that sure seems like i only got what I paid for.. on:
$ uname -r
3.13.0-92-generic
Looks good in linux world.
Alex
But, I would like to add that last time I checked (january 2015) the
linux kernel complained in /var/log/messages when receiving an RA
containing a plen 65. It called it "illegal" prefix length.
That RA was sent over usbnet. There is no specification of
IPv6-over-USB, there is no IID length requirement to be 64, because
there is noo USB IEEE MAC address.
That was wrong at that time (call a 65 in RA "illegal"), I dont know
whether it still the case. I may check in some time in the following
weeks, and this is the question I will follow: is the linux kernel
complaining when receiving an RA with a plen 65 on usbnet? If yes, then
linux stilll has at least one problem with this 64.
What is sure is that there is still no IPv6-over-USB draft, so no IID 64
on USB.
It's a similar situation with cellular links instead of USB - no spec,
but hidden assumptions about it being 64. They are all wrong.
Alex
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME