Dear Andrew,
John Levine told us another story. And i know it from some other maillist.
For Khalid it will be immpossible to analyse, what is going on with some
emails in some specific situation. Only in the log file of the MTA you
can see it. But this is not possible for Khalid, or?
I don't know, if you are member in the admin group. And i don't know, if
John is member in the admin group. Independent, this group have to start
the process of analyse.
But John wrote, they work long time for that. And it is absolutly true,
"It's a pain, it stinks,...". I wish you to find the real bug.
many greetings, willi
On 27/02/2017 01:38, John Levine wrote:
>
> This is the DMARC problem that has been discussed at length here.
> It's a pain, it stinks, we're working on it.
> R's,
> John
On 26/02/2017 22:18, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:19:13PM -0300, willi uebelherr wrote:
the first action have to come from the ietf-discuss admin group and not from
Khalid. The admin group have to analyse the bounce-counter for all list
members.
No. Khalid's mail bounced something that came from the ietf mail
list, and it came to his mail because he was subscribed to that mail
list. And therefore, the question is why his configuration is
bouncing things from the ietf mail server. And that determination can
only be made at his end.
A