On 03/31/2017 04:11 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
I do not understand how 2460bis makes it "easier" if proposed change to
the text directly tries to prohibit what is described in a document
already long time back accepted as a 6man working group draft.
This is incorrect. For instance, the condition to accepting such I-D as
a wg items was indeed that EH insertion was removed, and that
encapsulation be used instead.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont(_at_)si6networks(_dot_)com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492