On 11 April 2017 at 18:51, Stephen Farrell
<stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
(*) That is the argument for draft-mm-effect-encrypt, for which I
do support publication (apparently in disagreement with Martin in
that case:-)
Taking a break from email is so refreshing...
I would very much like to see a document like this that captures these
use cases and practices. The problem I have with it are simple: it
isn't particularly coherent, and it makes statements that I disagree
with. Those statements are particularly bad because they are also
unnecessary (see Brian Carpenter's comments about facts).