Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

I don't care, once IDs will be removed, I will unsubscribe and will not submit 
anything here again.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
From: Benjamin Kaduk
To: Khaled Omar ,ietf-secretariat(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
CC: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org


Dear Khaled,

Speaking as sergeant-at-arms,

You were recently placed under a temporary suspension of posting
rights to this list [1], a message that suggested you use that
time to read about the process of submitting and discussing drafts
at the IETF. It seems that you have not taken advantage of the
opportunity to do so, as you persist in using an overly broad
recipient list when corresponding with the address used for draft
submission, and are attempting to block discussion of technical
issues on a list reserved for such discussions of technical issues.

With my authority as sergeant-at-arms under RFC 3004, I am forced to
request that the secretariat apply an additional restriction of your
posting rights for the period of 60 days, starting immediately.

If you do decide to bring new work to the IETF in the future, we
will expect that you and keep traffic on the IETF mailing
lists focused on discussion of technical issues and in the
appropriate venue(s).

-Ben Kaduk

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:55:02PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
> Hi Jasmine,
>
> As I'm the only author of the following IDs:
>
>
> 1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10): 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/
>
>
> 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP): 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/
>
>
> 3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP): 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/
>
>
> Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository.
>
> If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed or published 
> by the ietf, legal actions will be taken.
>
> Regards,
>
> Khaled Omar