ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

2017-05-26 10:03:44
Khaled,

The IESG has reviewed your request and the drafts will not be removed. Their 
response directly below:

---------
Alexa,

The drafts should not be removed. The IESG has not identified any unusual 
circumstances (e.g., mistaken claims of authorship or allegations of draft 
content violating the law) that warrant removal of these drafts.

Regards,
The IESG

--------
On May 22, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Khaled Omar 
<eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

As mentioned in the provided link:

"Internet-Drafts have no formal status, and are subject to change or removal 
at any time."

which explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an 
Internet Draft from the I-D Repository.

From today's date till reaching this consensus for removal, these IDs 
shouldn't be discussed or published by the ietf on any meeting or any 
official event as the contents are not representing the ietf anymore after 
this date.

I'm waiting for the IESG response ... I hope they can make a decision soon.

"When an I-D is removed from the Public I-D Archive, a copy will be kept in a 
location accessible by the IETF Secretariat."

This of course doesn't gives the ietf the right of making any usage of these 
I-Ds after its removal.



-----Original Message-----
From: Alexa Morris [mailto:amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:27 AM
To: Khaled Omar
Cc: Ole J. Jacobsen; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

Khaled,

The IESG has published a statement on this topic. Please see "IESG Statement 
on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site" at 
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/removal-of-an-internet-draft.html, which 
explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an Internet Draft 
from the I-D Repository.

I have forwarded your email to the IESG for their review. Please be patient 
as it will take at least several days for them to review and respond to this 
request. 

Regards,
Alexa

On May 22, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Khaled Omar 
<eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

I'm the only author of the listed IDs and they are submitted individually, I 
made this removal request and these IDs must not be stored on the ietf 
database anymore and the ietf representation must not exist after the 
request date and time which is 23rd of May, 2017 at 1:00 PM GMT+02:00.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ole Jacobsen [mailto:olejacobsen(_at_)me(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:02 AM
To: Khaled Omar
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.


You really have no idea how the IETF works, do you?


On Mon, 22 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:

Hi Jasmine,

As I'm the only author of the following IDs:


1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10): 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/


2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP): 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/


3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP): 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/


Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository.

If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed or 
published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken.

Regards,

Khaled Omar



----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
+1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com




----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
+1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com