Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
2017-05-26 10:03:44
Khaled,
The IESG has reviewed your request and the drafts will not be removed. Their
response directly below:
---------
Alexa,
The drafts should not be removed. The IESG has not identified any unusual
circumstances (e.g., mistaken claims of authorship or allegations of draft
content violating the law) that warrant removal of these drafts.
Regards,
The IESG
--------
On May 22, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Khaled Omar
<eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
As mentioned in the provided link:
"Internet-Drafts have no formal status, and are subject to change or removal
at any time."
which explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an
Internet Draft from the I-D Repository.
From today's date till reaching this consensus for removal, these IDs
shouldn't be discussed or published by the ietf on any meeting or any
official event as the contents are not representing the ietf anymore after
this date.
I'm waiting for the IESG response ... I hope they can make a decision soon.
"When an I-D is removed from the Public I-D Archive, a copy will be kept in a
location accessible by the IETF Secretariat."
This of course doesn't gives the ietf the right of making any usage of these
I-Ds after its removal.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexa Morris [mailto:amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:27 AM
To: Khaled Omar
Cc: Ole J. Jacobsen; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
Khaled,
The IESG has published a statement on this topic. Please see "IESG Statement
on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site" at
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/removal-of-an-internet-draft.html, which
explains that IESG consensus is required in order to remove an Internet Draft
from the I-D Repository.
I have forwarded your email to the IESG for their review. Please be patient
as it will take at least several days for them to review and respond to this
request.
Regards,
Alexa
On May 22, 2017, at 7:09 PM, Khaled Omar
<eng(_dot_)khaled(_dot_)omar(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'm the only author of the listed IDs and they are submitted individually, I
made this removal request and these IDs must not be stored on the ietf
database anymore and the ietf representation must not exist after the
request date and time which is 23rd of May, 2017 at 1:00 PM GMT+02:00.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ole Jacobsen [mailto:olejacobsen(_at_)me(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 1:02 AM
To: Khaled Omar
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
You really have no idea how the IETF works, do you?
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:
Hi Jasmine,
As I'm the only author of the following IDs:
1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/
2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/
3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP):
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/
Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository.
If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed or
published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken.
Regards,
Khaled Omar
----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
+1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com
----------
Alexa Morris / Executive Director / IETF
+1.510.492.4001
Email: amorris(_at_)amsl(_dot_)com
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Khaled Omar
- Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., shogunx
- RE: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Khaled Omar
- Message not available
- FW: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Khaled Omar
- Archived message removal? was Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Lloyd Wood
- Re: Archived message removal? was Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal., Mark Andrews
|
|
|