FW: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.



-----Original Message-----
From: Khaled Omar 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:45 PM
To: 'Paul Wouters'
Subject: RE: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

Your ideas will never spread if you don't know how to convey them to people. 
Blaming people to be unwilling to hear you, and telling others to be quiet if 
they are critical of your ideas only harms your ideas further.


Leave this only to me, I though the ietf can make a progress with any of these 
IDs, but they did not, so it is useless.

I wish you luck contemplating new ideas and new ways of cooperation.


Thanks, there are many ideas and can be represented anywhere.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wouters [mailto:paul(_at_)nohats(_dot_)ca]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:36 PM
To: Khaled Omar
Subject: RE: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

On Tue, 23 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:

This is a serious official request, if it means nothing for you, stop 
replying.


Your behaviour is wrong. It violates the rules of our community repeatedly. 
Which has triggered these kind of responses to you because you ignored many 
unofficial and a few official warnings.

Your ideas will never spread if you don't know how to convey them to people. 
Blaming people to be unwilling to hear you, and telling others to be quiet if 
they are critical of your ideas only harms your ideas further.

I wish you luck contemplating new ideas and new ways of cooperation.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: shogunx(_at_)sleekfreak(_dot_)ath(_dot_)cx 
[mailto:shogunx(_at_)sleekfreak(_dot_)ath(_dot_)cx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:43 PM
To: Khaled Omar
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk; ietf
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.

note well... i lol'd.

On Tue, 23 May 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:

I don't care, once IDs will be removed, I will unsubscribe and will 
not submit anything here again.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: IPv10, KRP, and RRP IDs Removal.
From: Benjamin Kaduk
To: Khaled Omar ,ietf-secretariat(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
CC: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org


      Dear Khaled,

      Speaking as sergeant-at-arms,

      You were recently placed under a temporary suspension of posting
      rights to this list [1], a message that suggested you use that
      time to read about the process of submitting and discussing
      drafts
      at the IETF. It seems that you have not taken advantage of the
      opportunity to do so, as you persist in using an overly broad
      recipient list when corresponding with the address used for
      draft
      submission, and are attempting to block discussion of technical
      issues on a list reserved for such discussions of technical
      issues.

      With my authority as sergeant-at-arms under RFC 3004, I am
      forced to
      request that the secretariat apply an additional restriction of
      your
      posting rights for the period of 60 days, starting immediately.

      If you do decide to bring new work to the IETF in the future, we
      will expect that you and keep traffic on the IETF mailing
      lists focused on discussion of technical issues and in the
      appropriate venue(s).

      -Ben Kaduk

      [1]

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg102743.html

      On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:55:02PM +0000, Khaled Omar wrote:
     > Hi Jasmine,
     >
     > As I'm the only author of the following IDs:
     >
     >
     > 1) Internet Protocol version 10 (IPv10):
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-ipv10/
     >
     >
     > 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP):
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-krp/
     >
     >
     > 3) Regional Routing Protocol (RRP):
      https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-omar-rrp/
     >
     >
     > Please remove them all from the ietf database or repository.
     >
     > If the ideas explained on these drafts will be used, discussed
      or published by the ietf, legal actions will be taken.
     >
     > Regards,
     >
     > Khaled Omar