mail-ng
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Setting the stage

2004-01-30 10:14:32


On Jan 30, 2004, at 2:41 AM, Paul Smith wrote:


I must admit, I'm having quite a hard time coming up with things that I'd want in 'mail-ng', that I couldn't do with the current protocols and some extensions..

I'll give you two:

real, honest to god, 8 bit transparency

and "kill the dot". If you've done any kind of serious email hacking, that phrase should make you twitch. And fundamentally, you can't take SMTP out of the 7bit, 1200 baud modem era and still realistically call it SMTP, or make it reasonably backwards compatible with SMTP.

Maybe even some SMTP extensions could be made SMTP mandatory items.

god, no. there are so many hacks on hacks on hacks in SMTP that it's a wonder the damn setup just hasn't collapsed. (Oh, wait. some would say it has...). Simply rearranging the parts in an RFC doesn't fix any of that. This is a chance to take what we've learned, apply modern design methods to it, and move on to something that doesn't require a PhD to send a bloody message...

Only to find that a bunch of servers screw it up anyway, because they've mis-implemented part of the protocol.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>