Hmmm. Even with this change, I'd rather not go down this road at all.
Tony
PS. There are people already planning on creating toolbar additions for
a variety of legacy MUAs. I'm sure builtin support won't be much further
out -- if we do our job right.
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
SM wrote:
You could have:
5.1. Legacy MUAs
Implementors of this proposal should be aware that many MUAs are
unlikely to be retrofit to support the new header and its semantics.
As there is keen interest in conveying the results of sender
authentication tests to legacy MUAs, other interim means of doing
so may be necessary while this proposal is adopted.
I'm okay with that wording. Tony/others?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html