SM wrote:
Hi Tony, At 16:30 20-04-2006, Tony Hansen wrote:Hmmm. Even with this change, I'd rather not go down this road at all.Are you suggesting dropping Section 5.1 altogether?
I'd be quite happy if it were dropped. I'm not demanding it, however, if
people can come up with reasonable language.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Auth-Results issue #4 method=value values, Murray S. Kucherawy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [mail-vet-discuss] Re: Auth-Results issues? #7 section 4.1, Murray S. Kucherawy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Re: Auth-Results issues? #8 secton 5.1, SM |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Re: Auth-Results issues? #8 secton 5.1, Murray S. Kucherawy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |