mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Draft as of 9/4/2007

2007-09-05 15:06:05


Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'm talking more about reaching consensus here, and then exposing it to
some of the communities you listed.  I've already pointed ietf-dkim at
it more than once, but I guess the next steps are MAAWG "technical" and
ietf-822.

Sometimes the "Last Call Before Submission" label on the request improves people's motivation to respond.


a) Be able to demonstrate a broad base of direct support -- is there a reasonable extensive history of commentary and revision involving one or more open fora with an interesting range of active participants?
In here yes, but this community is somewhat limited in size.  That's why
I'm interested in exposing it to a wider audience.

Dandy.


b) Be able to demonstrate a reasonable degree of implementation experience and preferably also some use experience, if practical. That isn't on any formal process requirement, but it makes a world of difference when debating against the inevitable abstract theory "criticisms" that seem to come from assorted well-intentioned, bright, naive folk in positions of some leverage.
I think I've got this covered at least via the implementations I maintain.

For the concern I'm raising, probably not. Remember that my focus is frankly less about technical competence than on demonstrating that there is a useful base of the community that is embracing the work. Having a variety of folks do implementation, testing, and deployment is what serves that need.


It has had a thoroughly legitimate and productive development history. So it's not that I am actually worried about the quality of the work, or spec. It's that I think it needs at least one more iteration of review by a somewhat broader audience, to gain a critical mass of demonstrable support. (Unless I've missed that it's already been done, and gosh, that just never happens.)
This is what I'm hoping to do next.

ack.

tnx.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>