Incorporated most of your suggestions. A new draft is coming shortly.
Charles Lindsey wrote:
Should we allow for the possibility of more than one <propspec>?
For example:
dkim=pass header(_dot_)i=sender(_at_)example(_dot_)com
header.t=1189079141
I might consider including "header.d", but really the intent of this
clause of the result is to indicate what sender or signer was
authenticated. "header.t" doesn't really make any indication of such.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html