On Wednesday 12 March 2008 11:08:46 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Can one of you provide a revised list of values and explanations for one
or the other (or both)?
Based on your other response, I think I took his comment out of context. I
understand it now, I think it's fine as it's limited to common definitions
and not actually conflating results. Sorry for the noise.
When I went back and read it again, I did notice one additional item I'd
suggest changing. In the RFC 4408 definition of Neutral, it also says:
"A "Neutral" result MUST be treated exactly like the "None" result; the
distinction exists only for informational purposes."
That's actually (IIRC) the only reciever policy MUST in the entire RFC and I
think it's worth repeating here.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html