mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] Reworked section 2 (for -13)

2008-03-12 11:38:25
Dotzero wrote:

Notwithstanding Scotts comment, I was thinking of the case of SIDF
where there is an arbitrary Sender field.
  

Wouldn't the propspec cover that?

In this case, the policy checked is that of the domain from the
RFC2822 Sender field and not the domain of the RFC 2821 Mail From
field.
  
So one would be header(_dot_)sender=foo(_at_)bar, the other would be 
smtp(_dot_)from=foo(_at_)bar (and moreover it would be spf=pass vs. 
sender-id=pass), so a parser could definitely tell what got evaluated.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>