On 24/10/2008 11:10, "Dave CROCKER" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
Let's be clear that auth-header already has an operational base and that that
base hasn't complained about its utility. Quite the opposite.
+2 (because I've worked on implementations of the header at two companies
thus far.)
Changing it now, without an unassailably good reason, would result in
unnecessary ambiguousness and the lobbing of rotten fruit.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html