I'll bite: We use it to communicate to our MUAs the results of checking
the DKIM and DomainKey signatures. That's it.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Dave CROCKER wrote:
J D Falk wrote:
+2 (because I've worked on implementations of the header at two companies
thus far.)
Hmmm. It occurs to me that it might help things to have reports from those
who
are using the header. Who is using and how they are using it could help
establish a referential base when a) considering whether the spec is worthy
of
standardization, and b) considering proposed changes to the specification.
d/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html