mail-vet-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header

2009-01-10 16:49:36

I tend to support Doug but havnt had the inclination to post much.

Bill Oxley
Messaging Engineer
Cox Communications, Inc
404-847-6397



-----Original Message-----
From: mail-vet-discuss-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org on behalf of Lisa 
Dusseault
Sent: Fri 1/9/2009 3:48 PM
To: Douglas Otis
Cc: mail-vet-discuss(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header
 
Hi Doug, 

Does anybody support your review of sender-auth-header, to the point of 
believing that the document should not be published?  So far you are still very 
much in the rough part of rough consensus.  

thanks,
Lisa


On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Douglas Otis <dotis(_at_)mail-abuse(_dot_)org> 
wrote:


        Murray,
        
        There has been progress, but a few extremely critical security related
        areas still need to be addressed.
        
        I have posted a draft that reviews the sender-auth-header draft.
        
        The text and html versions are available at:
        
        
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.txt
        
http://www.sonic.net/~dougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html 
<http://www.sonic.net/%7Edougotis/id/draft-otis-auth-header-sec-issues-00.html> 
        
        -Doug
        _______________________________________________
        NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
        



_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>