Hi Bill, On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:45 AM, <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com> wrote:
I tend to support Doug but havnt had the inclination to post much.
Contributions to consensus during IETF Last Call would have been much preferable. Still, I'm paying attention. What remedy, changes in text or changes in status do you support? Thanks, Lisa
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Previous by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header, Bill.Oxley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header, Dave CROCKER |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header, Bill.Oxley |
Next by Thread: | Re: [mail-vet-discuss] -19 of draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header, Dave CROCKER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |